Metrology enhanced tooling for aerospace (META): A live fixturing Wing Box assembly case study

Aerospace manufacturers typically use monolithic steel fixtures to control the form of assemblies; this tooling is very expensive to manufacture, has long lead times and has little ability to accommodate product variation and design changes. Traditionally, the tool setting and recertification process is manual and time consuming, monolithic structures are required in order to maintain the tooling tolerances for multiple years without recertification. As part of a growing requirement to speed up tool-setting procedures this report explores a coupon study of live fixturing; that is, automated: fixture setting, correction and measurement. The study aims to use a measurement instrument to control the position of an actuated tooling flag, the flag will automatically move until the Key Characteristic (KC) of the part/assembly is within tolerance of its nominal position. This paper updates developments with the Metrology Enhanced Tooling for Aerospace (META) Framework which interfaces multiple metrology technologies with the tooling, components, workers and automation. This will allow rapid or even real-time fixture re-certification with improved product verification leading to a reduced risk of product non-conformance and increased fixture utilization while facilitating flexible fixtures.

Authors

O C Martin¹, J E Muelaner¹, Z Wang¹,
A Kayani², D Tomlinson², P G Maropoulos¹, P Helgasson³

1 – Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Bath, Bath, UK
2 – Airbus UK
3 – Delfoi

Presented at

Proceedings of DET2011

7th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology

Athens, Greece
28-30 September 2011

Download

References

1. Burley G, Odi R, Naing S, Williamson A and Corbett J,
   “Jigless aerospace manufacture – The enabling
   technologies”, in Aerospace Manufacturing
   Technology Conference & Exposition. Bellevue,
   Washington: Society of Automotive Engineers, 1999
2. Durrantwhyte HF, “Sensor models and multisensor
   integration”, International Journal of Robotics
   Research, Vol. 7, No. 6, 1988, pp 97-113
3. Gooch R, “Optical metrology in manufacturing
   automation”, Sensor Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1998, pp
   81-87
4. Huang Y, Lan Y, Hoffmann WC and Lacey RE,
   “Multisensor Data Fusion for High Quality Data
   Analysis and Processing in Measurement and
   Instrumentation”, Journal of Bionic Engineering, Vol
   4, No. 1, 2007, pp 53-62
5. Jayaweera N and Webb P, “Metrology-assisted robotic
   processing of aerospace applications”, International
   Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol.
   23, No. 3, 2010, pp 283-296
6. Maropoulos PG, Guo Y, Jamshidi J and Cai B, “Large
   volume metrology process models: A framework for
   integrating measurement with assembly planning”,
   CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 57,
   No. 1, 2008, pp 477-480
7. Martin OC, Muelaner JE, Tomlinson D, Kayani A and
   Maropoulos PG, “Metrology Enhanced Tooling for
   Aerospace (META) Framework”, Proceedings of the
   36th International MATADOR Conference,
   Manchester, 2010, pp 363-366
8. Rooks B, “Assembly in aerospace features at IEE
   seminar”, Assembly Automation, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2005, pp 108-111
9. Saadat M and Cretin C, “Dimensional variations during
   Airbus wing assembly” Assembly Automation, Vol.
   22, No. 3, 2002, pp 270-279
10. Weckenmann A, Jiang X, Sommer KD, Neuschaefer-
    Rube U, Seewig J, Shaw L and Estler T, “Multisensor
    data fusion in dimensional metrology”, CIRP Annals –
    Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2009, pp
    701-721